Village/Hamlet, Town/Village (County) - maximum permitted flow (gpd)
1. Hunter, Hunter (Greene) - 200,000
2. Fleischmanns, Middletown (Delaware) - 80,000
3. Windham/Hensonville, Windham (Greene) - 143,000
4. Andes, Andes (Delaware) - 58,000
5. Roxbury, Roxbury (Delaware) - 68,000
6. Phoenicia, Shandaken (Ulster) - 94,000
7. Prattsville, Prattsville (Greene) - 60,000
8. Bloomville, Kortright/Stamford (Delaware ) - 40,000
9. Boiceville, Olive (Ulster) - 48,000
10. Hamden, Hamden (Delaware) - 31,000
11. Delancey, Hamden (Delaware) - 29,000
12. Bovina Center, Bovina (Delaware) - 37,000
13. Ashland, Ashland (Greene) - 31,000
14. Haines Falls, Hunter (Greene) -
58,000
(to service the portion of Haines Falls within the Watershed)
15. Trout Creek, Tomkins (Delaware) - 17,000
16. Lexington, Lexington (Greene) - 32,000
17. S. Kortright, Kortright/Stamford (Delaware) - 17,000
18. Shandaken, Shandaken (Ulster) - 36,000
19. West Conesville, Conesville (Schoharie) - 15,000
20. Claryville, Denning/Neversink (Ulster & Sullivan) - 16,000
21. Halcottsville, Middletown (Delaware) - 19,000
22. New Kingston, Middletown (Delaware) - 13,000
B. For the Identified Communities numbered 1-7 in Section 2.04A, New Infrastructure Funds may be used for projects to construct new WWTPs or community septics, including related sewerage collection systems; to create and fund septic districts; or a combination of WWTPs and/or community septics and a septic district.
C. For the Identified Communities numbered 8-22 in Section 2.04A, New Infrastructure Funds may be used for projects to construct community septics, including related sewerage collection systems, or to create and fund septic districts. If community septic systems or septic districts are not practicable due to site conditions, and there is a demonstrable water quality problem due to failing septic systems, the City, in consultation with the CW Corp. and the Identified Community, may elect to allocate New Infrastructure Funds for the projects to construct a new WWTP, including related sewerage collection systems, in such Identified Communities.
D. To the extent practical, any WWTP constructed with New Infrastructure Funds shall discharge subsurface. For purposes of this subparagraph, subsurface discharge shall be deemed impractical if there is insufficient land area or inadequate soil available for subsurface discharge within reasonable proximity of the proposed WWTP. The Parties recognize that this requirement is a material condition of New Infrastructure Funds and agree that, for a new WWTP receiving New Infrastructure Funds, the requirement to discharge subsurface, if practical, shall be a condition to the issuance of any State Pollutant Discharge Elimination Systems ("SPDES") permit under Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation Law, as if it were set forth as such in 6 NYCRR Part 752. The Parties further agree that compliance with such subsurface discharge requirement shall constitute a significant permitting condition as that term is defined in 6 NYCRR § 624.4(c)(3), so that such requirement shall constitute an adjudicable issue in any New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC") hearing on such permit application provided that the objecting party satisfies all other applicable requirements of 6 NYCRR § 624.4(c).
E. If an Identified Community is interested in participating in the Program, the Identified Community must notify NYCDEP, in writing, of its interest no later than July 1, 1997 ("Letter of Interest"). The Letter of Interest shall state that an Identified Community is interested in entering into negotiations regarding execution of an Identified Community Agreement as set forth in Section 2.03. The Identified Community Agreement shall only commit the Identified Community to conduct a Study as set forth in Section 2.05A, and shall not bind the Identified Community to accept New Infrastructure Funds to build a new WWTP or community septic or to create septic districts.